MacBook SSD may actually be one of the fastest MacBooks
Yes it expensive, but the first early benchmarks and user reports are trickling in now and it looks very impressive indeed. This adds even more fuel into the internal MacBook controversy I’m facing.
MacRumors user bjdraw posted XBench marks for the MacBook Air 1.8GHz SSD
Was just at the Apple store playing with the 1.8 SSD. I downloaded xBench and ran the test. The overall disk score was 48, which is faster than any Apple laptop benched recently by Engadget .
Salty Pirate also tried it out:
The SSD is wicked fast. Programs load almost instantly. Faster than on my MBP 2.4 with a 200GB 7200 disk. I have changed my mind and I am gonna get the SSD link
Viper says:
I think you would notice a performance difference….what i have read is that opening itunes with the SSD takes <1 bounce of the dock icon, while with the 1.6/80 it takes 2-3 bounces….since this action is mostly reading from the HDD and not processor intense, you can infer that the SSD is much faster. link
Suitability for development
Assuming that you can weed your stuff down to fit on the 64GB model, what about development speed.
SSD drives are fast at anything except random access writes, which I think is what goes on when you compile code and run lots of inserts and updates in a database. Can anyone provide an opinion on this? It’s not that I’m going to be hosting on it, but it would be nice if autotest speeds aren’t adversely affected by it as I talked about in my previous MacBook Air Post.
For easy reading here are the XBench Bench marks:
Results 59.23 System Info Xbench Version 1.3 System Version 10.5.1 (9B2324) Physical RAM 2048 MB Model MacBookAir1,1 Drive Type MCCOE64GEMPP MCCOE64GEMPP CPU Test 99.61 GCD Loop 198.48 10.46 Mops/sec Floating Point Basic 91.95 2.18 Gflop/sec vecLib FFT 82.14 2.71 Gflop/sec Floating Point Library 82.87 14.43 Mops/sec Thread Test 134.99 Computation 132.25 2.68 Mops/sec, 4 threads Lock Contention 137.85 5.93 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads Memory Test 148.00 System 147.16 Allocate 196.92 723.16 Kalloc/sec Fill 121.83 5923.81 MB/sec Copy 140.85 2909.18 MB/sec Stream 148.84 Copy 139.04 2871.77 MB/sec Scale 138.74 2866.37 MB/sec Add 160.25 3413.70 MB/sec Triad 160.42 3431.74 MB/sec Quartz Graphics Test 107.74 Line 111.96 7.45 Klines/sec [50% alpha] Rectangle 120.42 35.95 Krects/sec [50% alpha] Circle 97.44 7.94 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha] Bezier 109.91 2.77 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha] Text 101.95 6.38 Kchars/sec OpenGL Graphics Test 18.27 Spinning Squares 18.27 23.18 frames/sec User Interface Test 113.53 Elements 113.53 521.06 refresh/sec Disk Test 47.26 Sequential 40.82 Uncached Write 33.92 20.83 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 46.51 26.32 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 27.24 7.97 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 97.00 48.75 MB/sec [256K blocks] Random 56.13 Uncached Write 21.06 2.23 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 52.85 16.92 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 990.68 7.02 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 259.96 48.24 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Follow me on Twitter
Well, good luck and all.
But it’s a bit like faster boot times – I don’t reboot my mac more than once a fortnight, so it’s moot.
Similarly, I can fit enough RAM in my MBP (or Macbook) to ensure i only need to start iTunes once and leave it running forever.
Remember you’ll have a lot less disk, so your iTunes library is going to be a lot smaller – hence faster to load up :)
HI THERE WELL APPLE UPGRADED THERE SSD DRIVES NOW AT 128 GB SOO THAT WE NOW CAN STORE A LOT MORE ITUNES FROM THE OLD 64 GB SSD.
HI THERE FOUND INFO ON MACBOOKS AND MACBOOK SSD 13 INCH MACBOOK USES SAMSUNG 128 GB SSD READ SPEED 220 MB/S RIGHT SPEAD OF 180 MB/S AND THE 17 INCH MACBOOK PRO USES A SAMSUNG 256 GB SSD READ SPEED 250 MB/S AND RIGHT SPEED OF 200 MB/S SO I DONT THUINK ANY PC SSD DRIVES CAN GO THAT FAST.
Hmm.. wonder if that’s a different model as Samsung’s own specs aren’t that fancy: http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/products/flash/ssd/2008/product/lineup.html
Hmm.. wonder if that’s a different model as Samsung’s own specs aren’t that fancy: http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/products/flash/ssd/2008/product/lineup.html
hi there apple has add a 256 gb ssd for the 13 inch macbook and the 15 inch macbook pro
Contemplating buying a macbook pro specifically so I can get the 256GB SSD drive preconfigured and do development – in my case C# development so I’ll probably run Visual Studio in paralells but it will likely still be faster on compile.
You should check out what Joel Spoelsky and Hanselman have to say on SSD drives and compilation time – they claim that since compilation involves loading lots and lots of tiny files compilation is significantly speeded up.
During that build-test-fix cycle when running your unit tests, speed of compilation is absolutely key as it keeps you in the ‘zone’.
From what I can make out (so far) if you want an SSD drive pre-installed on a new 15 inch laptop you have to buy a mac. 13 inches is just too small a screen for me (I think).
Joel on SSD:
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2009/03/27.html
Hanselman
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/UpgradingMyLenovoW500ToAOCZVertex250GBSATAIISolidStateDiskSSD.aspx
Atwood
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000927.html
I wish you the best of luck with the new laptop. Me too!
Just realised this post was from way back in 2008! ;-) Did you end up becoming a macbook airhead? Would love to hear how the experience was for development?
I just purchased a MacBook Air 2.18Ghz/2GB RAM/128GB SSD and the speed of the SSD (the whole machine really) is stunning considering the very lack luster CPU clock speed.
The difference between perceived speed and actual speed is the difference. When you open an application like TextMate and it appears also instantly then it feels like lightning even if it’s a “trick”.
It “feels” as fast as the MacPro beside my desk and to me that is all that matters.