MacBook SSD may actually be one of the fastest MacBooks

Posted by Pelle February 1st, 2008 8 comments edit

Yes it expensive, but the first early benchmarks and user reports are trickling in now and it looks very impressive indeed. This adds even more fuel into the internal MacBook controversy I’m facing.

MacRumors user bjdraw posted XBench marks for the MacBook Air 1.8GHz SSD

Was just at the Apple store playing with the 1.8 SSD. I downloaded xBench and ran the test. The overall disk score was 48, which is faster than any Apple laptop benched recently by Engadget .

Salty Pirate also tried it out:

The SSD is wicked fast. Programs load almost instantly. Faster than on my MBP 2.4 with a 200GB 7200 disk. I have changed my mind and I am gonna get the SSD link

Viper says:

I think you would notice a performance difference….what i have read is that opening itunes with the SSD takes <1 bounce of the dock icon, while with the 1.6/80 it takes 2-3 bounces….since this action is mostly reading from the HDD and not processor intense, you can infer that the SSD is much faster. link

Suitability for development

Assuming that you can weed your stuff down to fit on the 64GB model, what about development speed.

SSD drives are fast at anything except random access writes, which I think is what goes on when you compile code and run lots of inserts and updates in a database. Can anyone provide an opinion on this? It’s not that I’m going to be hosting on it, but it would be nice if autotest speeds aren’t adversely affected by it as I talked about in my previous MacBook Air Post.

For easy reading here are the XBench Bench marks:

Results	59.23	
	System Info		
		Xbench Version		1.3
		System Version		10.5.1 (9B2324)
		Physical RAM		2048 MB
		Model		MacBookAir1,1
		Drive Type		MCCOE64GEMPP MCCOE64GEMPP
	CPU Test	99.61	
		GCD Loop	198.48	10.46 Mops/sec
		Floating Point Basic	91.95	2.18 Gflop/sec
		vecLib FFT	82.14	2.71 Gflop/sec
		Floating Point Library	82.87	14.43 Mops/sec
	Thread Test	134.99	
		Computation	132.25	2.68 Mops/sec, 4 threads
		Lock Contention	137.85	5.93 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
	Memory Test	148.00	
		System	147.16	
			Allocate	196.92	723.16 Kalloc/sec
			Fill	121.83	5923.81 MB/sec
			Copy	140.85	2909.18 MB/sec
		Stream	148.84	
			Copy	139.04	2871.77 MB/sec
			Scale	138.74	2866.37 MB/sec
			Add	160.25	3413.70 MB/sec
			Triad	160.42	3431.74 MB/sec
	Quartz Graphics Test	107.74	
		Line	111.96	7.45 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
		Rectangle	120.42	35.95 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
		Circle	97.44	7.94 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
		Bezier	109.91	2.77 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
		Text	101.95	6.38 Kchars/sec
	OpenGL Graphics Test	18.27	
		Spinning Squares	18.27	23.18 frames/sec
	User Interface Test	113.53	
		Elements	113.53	521.06 refresh/sec
	Disk Test	47.26	
		Sequential	40.82	
			Uncached Write	33.92	20.83 MB/sec [4K blocks]
			Uncached Write	46.51	26.32 MB/sec [256K blocks]
			Uncached Read	27.24	7.97 MB/sec [4K blocks]
			Uncached Read	97.00	48.75 MB/sec [256K blocks]
		Random	56.13	
			Uncached Write	21.06	2.23 MB/sec [4K blocks]
			Uncached Write	52.85	16.92 MB/sec [256K blocks]
			Uncached Read	990.68	7.02 MB/sec [4K blocks]
			Uncached Read	259.96	48.24 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Posted February 1st, 2008 under:
Comments

Leave a response

rasputnik@hellooperator.net
Dick Davies February 1st, 2008 destroy

Well, good luck and all.

But it’s a bit like faster boot times – I don’t reboot my mac more than once a fortnight, so it’s moot.

Similarly, I can fit enough RAM in my MBP (or Macbook) to ensure i only need to start iTunes once and leave it running forever.

Remember you’ll have a lot less disk, so your iTunes library is going to be a lot smaller – hence faster to load up :)

mavbraselton@comcast.net
james braselton November 20th, 2008 destroy

HI THERE WELL APPLE UPGRADED THERE SSD DRIVES NOW AT 128 GB SOO THAT WE NOW CAN STORE A LOT MORE ITUNES FROM THE OLD 64 GB SSD.

mavbraselton@comcast.net
james braselton February 15th, 2009 destroy

HI THERE FOUND INFO ON MACBOOKS AND MACBOOK SSD 13 INCH MACBOOK USES SAMSUNG 128 GB SSD READ SPEED 220 MB/S RIGHT SPEAD OF 180 MB/S AND THE 17 INCH MACBOOK PRO USES A SAMSUNG 256 GB SSD READ SPEED 250 MB/S AND RIGHT SPEED OF 200 MB/S SO I DONT THUINK ANY PC SSD DRIVES CAN GO THAT FAST.

Scott Mangrove March 4th, 2009 destroy

Hmm.. wonder if that’s a different model as Samsung’s own specs aren’t that fancy: http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/products/flash/ssd/2008/product/lineup.html

Hmm.. wonder if that’s a different model as Samsung’s own specs aren’t that fancy: http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/products/flash/ssd/2008/product/lineup.html

mavbraselton@comcast.net
james brraselton March 5th, 2009 destroy

hi there apple has add a 256 gb ssd for the 13 inch macbook and the 15 inch macbook pro

utunga@gmail.com
miles thompson October 1st, 2009 destroy

Contemplating buying a macbook pro specifically so I can get the 256GB SSD drive preconfigured and do development – in my case C# development so I’ll probably run Visual Studio in paralells but it will likely still be faster on compile.

You should check out what Joel Spoelsky and Hanselman have to say on SSD drives and compilation time – they claim that since compilation involves loading lots and lots of tiny files compilation is significantly speeded up.

During that build-test-fix cycle when running your unit tests, speed of compilation is absolutely key as it keeps you in the ‘zone’.

From what I can make out (so far) if you want an SSD drive pre-installed on a new 15 inch laptop you have to buy a mac. 13 inches is just too small a screen for me (I think).

Joel on SSD:
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2009/03/27.html

Hanselman
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/UpgradingMyLenovoW500ToAOCZVertex250GBSATAIISolidStateDiskSSD.aspx

Atwood
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000927.html

I wish you the best of luck with the new laptop. Me too!

utunga@gmail.com
miles thompson October 1st, 2009 destroy

Just realised this post was from way back in 2008! ;-) Did you end up becoming a macbook airhead? Would love to hear how the experience was for development?

cthree87@gmail.com
Erik January 8th, 2010 destroy

I just purchased a MacBook Air 2.18Ghz/2GB RAM/128GB SSD and the speed of the SSD (the whole machine really) is stunning considering the very lack luster CPU clock speed.

The difference between perceived speed and actual speed is the difference. When you open an application like TextMate and it appears also instantly then it feels like lightning even if it’s a “trick”.

It “feels” as fast as the MacPro beside my desk and to me that is all that matters.

Comment